you guys do not get at all what is in there. You are just confronting me, and accusing me not being an expert. If I agree on not being an expert, will anyone here be happier?
FFTW documentation is not helpful, you guys have been working on this for ages, now you can't see the challenge in that. Of course, I will write my code sooner or later, but you guys also can do smt. to improve it. For an near example, look at any any cc language documentation. There is no book that written for an expert. The simpler is better in writing. Again, it is up to you, more people understand, more users will implement your code. It is a kind of marketing. Apart from all, I respect all what have done up to now. Пятница, 24 января 2014, 10:03 -05:00 от Aditya Dhananjay <adi...@cs.nyu.edu>: >Hi Nasi, > > >>And the problem is in that input part. It is not clear what is inbuf... >>I create gr_complex vector and want to input it into fft. It does not work in >>any way. There are alot of questions are still open. > >You can look at fft.cc and fft_vcc_fftw.cc. It is quite clear how the FFTW >library is called by GNU Radio. The documentation of FFTW is also quite good. >You can look up how to use a "plan" to calculate forward/reverse FFTs. > >> >>Coder is a good coder if his code is readable first. Anyone one can design a >>confusing language. > >With all due respect, Nasi, please refrain from biting the hand that feeds, >and then asking for more. > >Happy hacking! > >best, >aditya -- NE
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
