On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Activecat <active...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Koslowski, Sebastian (CEL) < > sebastian.koslow...@kit.edu> wrote: > >> On 05/14/2014 12:29 PM, Activecat wrote: >> > I have then tested few combinations, it seems that a source block cannot >> > have a message sink port. >> > Is there such a restriction ..? >> >> Not that I know of... >> >> <?xml version='1.0' encoding='ASCII'?> >> <block> >> <name>Test</name> >> <key>message_sink_complex_source_test</key> >> <category>Custom</category> >> <make>None</make> >> <sink> >> <name>in</name> >> <type>message</type> >> <optional>True</optional> >> </sink> >> <source> >> <name>out</name> >> <type>complex</type> >> </source> >> </block> >> >> > I retried by putting the definition of <sink></sink> on top of > <source></source> in the xml file, it works. > It seems that the "sink" definition must be placed on top of "source" .. > > Problem solved, thank everyone ! > Yes, this is the strictness of the XML DTD. Glad you got it working. Tom
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
