It doesn't work for me!

On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Activecat <[email protected]> wrote:

> Try this: On the flowgraph Options, configure the Max Number Of Output to
> 1.
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Mostafa Alizadeh 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> *After producing one block of data,* the scheduler always come back to
>> the source block if the source doesn't produce anything and the scheduler
>> doesn't see any other blocks!!! (I don't know why)
>>
>> I didn't say I just want one block of data, I meant I need to mandate the
>> source and tell it when produce data.
>> please help me! :(
>>
>> best,
>> Mostafa
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Activecat <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Mostafa Alizadeh <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>
>>>> I want to connect a source to a sink block but there must be a sort of
>>>> synchronization between them. The sink block should ask the source to
>>>> generate data stream on some specific instances. Between these instances,
>>>> the source block must put to the sleep or be disabled. How could I do this?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The scheduler takes care of this. You don't need to worry this.
>>>
>>>
>>>  I thought it was possible with exchanging messages between these two
>>>> blocks by which the sink block send a message to the source to disable or
>>>> enable it. But this doesn't work because the scheduler will remain on the
>>>> source after generating only one block of data (I need to generate just one
>>>> block) at the start up of the flowgraph!
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you just need to generate only one block of data (one element), then
>>> you may not need gnuradio.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to