I see. Is there someone we can contact at Ettus for this?

Khalid

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Marcus D. Leech <[email protected]> wrote:

>  On 01/16/2015 02:54 PM, khalid.el-darymli wrote:
>
> I see. If you would like to diagnose the problem, we can ship you the
> malfunctioned daughterboard?
>
>  Thanks,
> Khalid
>
>   Thanks.  I personally wouldn't have time/equipment to really diagnose
> it.  So it would be up to Ettus R&D as to whether they want it back to see
>   what the failure mode is.
>
> I've been doing Ettus support for 6 years, and LF_TX are not generally
> items that show up with RMA requests very often.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Marcus D. Leech <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>  On 01/16/2015 02:42 PM, khalid.el-darymli wrote:
>>
>> We were using only one Tx channel with the Subdev Spec in the USRP Sink
>> is set to A:AB
>>
>>  Could the failure be due to that the other (idle) Tx channel is left
>> open circuit (i.e., not terminated by 50 ohms)?
>>
>>  That seems quite unlikely.  These aren't "precious princess" RF power
>> transistors, but reasonably-robust differential-to-unbalanced drivers.  I'd
>>   be very surprised if they couldn't handle an open-circuit condition.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Khalid
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Marcus D. Leech <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  On 01/16/2015 02:08 PM, khalid.el-darymli wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>  Just to update you in case somebody else comes across this problem.
>>> Following Mike's advice, we replaced the LFTX daughterboard with a new one.
>>> We're getting now 1 V p-p. This is around 4 dBm.
>>>
>>>  Thanks very much for your help.
>>>
>>>  Best regards,
>>> Khalid
>>>
>>>
>>>   Interesting.  The driver chip that's used, as a unity-gain
>>> differential-to-single-ended driver, is, according to the datasheets,
>>> pretty robust.  So, it would
>>>   be interesting to know exactly what the failure mode is.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Michael Rahaim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Khalid,
>>>>
>>>>  I had a similar issue with an LFTX that I had been working with for
>>>> about two years. I actually had two boards running on separate USRP2's and
>>>> both were working fine for quite a while, but I recently noticed that one
>>>> had a drastically lower output range. I ended up replacing the LFTX and all
>>>> is working well now, so I'm assuming it was a hardware issue that came up
>>>> at some point.
>>>>
>>>>  I didn't take the time to look for the problem, but I figured I'd
>>>> share this info since what you're seeing might be a hardware issue rather
>>>> than something you can resolve with settings.
>>>>
>>>>  -Mike
>>>>
>>>>  On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:59 PM, khalid.el-darymli <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Output power is determined largely by baseband signal magnitude in
>>>>> that case.
>>>>>  Yes, I understand. And I noticed that for baseband signal with an
>>>>> amplitude *> 1, * the pass-band signal gets clipped off. So I assume
>>>>> that an amplitude of 1 for the baseband signal should deliver the maximum
>>>>> output power (for the pass-band signal).
>>>>>
>>>>>  My question was, what is the maximum power one can get for the
>>>>> pass-band signal output from LFTX? In your earlier reply, you said it is
>>>>> around +7dBm, am I getting this right? In my case, for a baseband 
>>>>> amplitude
>>>>> of around 1, I am only getting *-28.13dBm*, much less than what you
>>>>> said, I am not sure,* why?*
>>>>>
>>>>>  Thanks,
>>>>>  Khalid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Marcus D. Leech <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   Thanks Marcus for your reply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Probably somewhere in the neighborhood of +7dBm, maybe a little
>>>>>> more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  >> The LF/BASIC series have *no* gain in either path, so you're
>>>>>> just looked
>>>>>> at buffered ADC ouput.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, ~ *+7dBm* is the max output power I supposed to get from the
>>>>>> LFTX daughterboard? How do I get that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Since I am only getting -28.13 dBm, does that mean I have some issue
>>>>>> with my LFTX daughterboard?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Khalid
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Output power is determined largely by baseband signal magnitude
>>>>>> in that case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Message: 2
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 10:13:45 -0330
>>>>>> From: "khalid.el-darymli" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] Max Output Power from the LFTX
>>>>>>         daughterboard
>>>>>> Message-ID:
>>>>>>         <CACdmG=zCHATiwrtv=wBVLwG0_
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the maximum output power from the LFTX daughterboard when
>>>>>> used with
>>>>>> the USRP N200?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to this datasheet [1], the N200 with the WBX daughterbaord
>>>>>> provide an output power of 15 dBm. However, when using the LFTX
>>>>>> daughterboard, I am getting a much less output power.
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> http://www.ettus.com/content/files/07495_Ettus_N200-210_DS_Flyer_HR.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In GNU Radio with the USRP N200, we use a sinusoid with a frequency
>>>>>> of 150
>>>>>> kHz and an amplitude of 0.98, fed into the LFTX daughterboard for a
>>>>>> center
>>>>>> frequency of 5 MHz. When the output of LFTX is plugged into a scope
>>>>>> terminated with a 50-ohm terminator, the scope reads 24.8 mV
>>>>>> (peak-to-peak). This is around -28.13 dBm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this the max power one can get out of the LFTX daughterboard?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Khalid
>>>>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>>>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>>>>> URL: <
>>>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/attachments/20150106/37846ff4/attachment.html
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Message: 3
>>>>>> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 08:48:08 -0500
>>>>>> From: "Marcus D. Leech" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Max Output Power from the LFTX
>>>>>>         daughterboard
>>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/06/2015 08:43 AM, khalid.el-darymli wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > What is the maximum output power from the LFTX daughterboard when
>>>>>> used
>>>>>> > with the USRP N200?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > According to this datasheet [1], the N200 with the WBX daughterbaord
>>>>>> > provide an output power of 15 dBm. However, when using the LFTX
>>>>>> > daughterboard, I am getting a much less output power.
>>>>>> > [1]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> http://www.ettus.com/content/files/07495_Ettus_N200-210_DS_Flyer_HR.pdf
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > In GNU Radio with the USRP N200, we use a sinusoid with a frequency
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> > 150 kHz and an amplitude of 0.98, fed into the LFTX daughterboard
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> > a center frequency of 5 MHz. When the output of LFTX is plugged
>>>>>> into a
>>>>>> > scope terminated with a 50-ohm terminator, the scope reads 24.8 mV
>>>>>> > (peak-to-peak). This is around -28.13 dBm.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Is this the max power one can get out of the LFTX daughterboard?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Best regards,
>>>>>> > Khalid
>>>>>> Probably somewhere in the neighborhood of +7dBm, maybe a little more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The LF/BASIC series have *no* gain in either path, so you're just
>>>>>> looked
>>>>>> at buffered ADC ouput.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Marcus Leech
>>>>>> Principal Investigator
>>>>>> Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium
>>>>>> http://www.sbrac.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Marcus Leech
>>>>>> Principal Investigator
>>>>>> Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortiumhttp://www.sbrac.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  -
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to