Hi Vaibhav,

how do you make sure the PSD measures the power in *exactly* the 6ms
you're sending in? Or do you continously measure? If the latter: do you
multiply with the duty cycle of each subchannel (ie. when you hop to 10
channels sequentially, each channel would only be used 10% of the time,
and thus, a long observation will only see 10% of power)? Are you
looking at an offline analysis, or at a live updated PSD plot, which
might actually miss a lot of bursts by only looking every
1/updates_per_second ?

I don't know the T-Mote sky nor the Received Signal Strength Indication
algorithm it uses, so I can't really say anything about that.

Best regards,
Marcus

On 03/02/2015 01:41 PM, vaibhav kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Marcus, 
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. yes, that may be the issue. As I am using
> the frequency_hopping.py module for specifying the hopping sequence
> and controlling the time and connecting it to other modulation blocks. 
>
> Signal width : 3Mhz
> I record the the received signal on another USRP and plot the PSD to
> check power. Further I also measure the RSSI values on a T-Mote sky
> node and plot them to check the RSSI of the Transmitted signal. 
>
> I start from 2.41Ghz and hop until 2.45 Ghz , separation of 5Mhz. 
> Thanks a lot for your inputs. I will try them right away. 
>
> Best, 
> Vaibhav
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Marcus Müller
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Vaibhav,
>
>     tuning is an issue, here. The problem is not that you're only
>     retuning the LO, the whole signal chain has to be correctly locked
>     in again after each tune.
>     If the total bandwidth you're spanning is less than 40MHz, which
>     is the baseband bandwidth of the daughterboard's you're using, try
>     setting your LO frequency to the center of that band, and hop via
>     frequency shifting in the FPGA only[0]. To do that, you'll need to
>     use tune_request_t[1] objects rather than simple using the target
>     frequency when tuning using set_tx_freq in your USRP sink.
>
>     Further things of interest: How do you measure the power of a 6ms
>     burst? How wide is your signal?
>
>     Greetings,
>     Marcus
>
>     [0]http://files.ettus.com/manual/page_general.html#general_tuning_process
>     [1]http://files.ettus.com/manual/structuhd_1_1tune__request__t.html
>
>     On 03/02/2015 12:24 PM, vaibhav kulkarni wrote:
>>     Dear All, 
>>
>>     I am trying to implement some frequency hopping schemes in the
>>     ISM band with USRP N210 with RFX 2400 board ( I also tried the
>>     same with the SBX 40MHz board). I hop to the next channel
>>     (channel seperation : 5MHz) after every 6ms (tuning time for RFX
>>     board is 250usec) so tuning is not an issue. I set max gain (20dB
>>     in case of RFX board) and 30 dB in case of (SBX Board) and send
>>     random modulated (BPSK) bits. 
>>
>>     However, I get very low power at the receiver (another USRP, RX
>>     gain 20dB)  around -70 to -80 dB 1 meter away from the tx USRP.
>>     When I dont perfrom frequency hopping I get a rx power of -10 dB.
>>     I am not able to understand why the tx power reduces by such an
>>     extent while perfroming fx hopping, although I give enough
>>     settling time. 
>>
>>     Also is there any firmware which allows to further increase the
>>     tx power ?
>>
>>     Any help to resolve this issue is appreciated.  
>>
>>     Best, 
>>     Vaibhav
>>     ETH Zurich
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
>

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to