Is there a plan to improve the layout customizability beyond the GUI Hints?
I think the gui hints are counter-intuitive and don't provide a lot of
control.

Rich

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Martin Braun <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On 24.03.2015 09:04, George Hadley wrote:
>
>> Greetings all,
>>
>>          I recently began using gnuradio and GRC with a pair of USRPs.
>> It's my understanding that plans are underway to ultimately remove WX in
>> v3.9 as a GUI option from gnuradio, and replace it with QT. It's also my
>> understanding that QT GUI development is underway in future versions of
>> gnuradio. I'm interested in attempting to help develop for gnuradio and
>> have forked a copy of the source from github.
>>
>
> Whoooo! We are really very happy about new developers, *especially* on the
> GUI side.
>
>
>>          With that in mind, I have a few questions:
>>
>>      1. Who is involved with QT GUI development for gnuradio?
>>
>
> Tom is the main guy for this, and he'll probably chip in.
>
>       2. What future improvements, especially functionality related, are
>>         planned for gnuradio QT? All I have been able to find in the
>>         3.8.0 roadmap is that grc will "introduce a QT version of GRC"
>>         (what does that mean?) and that gr-qtgui will be switching
>>         examples to use gr-qtgui instead of gr-wxgui. Functionality I'm
>>         most interested in includes X/Y mode for the QT GUI Time Sink
>>         and the ability to pause the output of the Time, Frequency, and
>>         Waterfall sinks (as is available via the "Stop" button in the WX
>>         counterparts.
>>
>
> Before you rush ahead, X/Y mode is already available through the
> 'constellation' sink. But that's not to say we can't change the time sink.
> Particularly for people who are used to it.
>
> Pause is already in QT -- check out the menu.
>
>       3. In looking over the WX and QT GUI options, I personally prefer
>>         the layout and functionality of the WX GUI components
>>         (specifically, the instrumentation options). Are there any plans
>>         to attempt to replicate the layout and options of the WX
>>         components? (Perhaps the old WX layout style and functionality
>>         are being abandoned for good reason; if that's the case, if
>>         anybody could clarify that for me or point me in the right
>>         direction I would be most appreciative.)
>>
>
> Yes, but don't want it to be permanent. Ideal woulde be a sidebar with
> instrumentation buttons that is collapsible, or hidable or something like
> that.
>
> There's a couple of things we'd like to add to the QT widgets, let me have
> a look if I can find that list.
>
> Cheers,
>
> M
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to