It's not unique to modern DSP systems, either. 

When we put together a bit-regenerating repeater for 56kbit packet "back
in the day", we had to design an elastic hardware buffer to "soak up"
slight differences in RX and TX clocks--the RX bit clock was from the
remote station, and TX bit-clock was ours. The elastic buffer worked OK
over the modest frame sizes we were using, but couldn't soak up skew
indefinitely.... 

On 2015-06-18 15:53, Nick Foster wrote: 

> We call this the "two clock problem". This is something people (including 
> myself) have been talking about implementing for ages. There's nothing 
> available in GNURadio right now to do this. 
> 
> --n 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:51 PM Richard Bell <[email protected]> 
> wrote: 
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm working on a system that has hardware defining an input rate and 
>> hardware defining an output rate. This is a data based system, so I can't 
>> afford to lose any bits, which implies sample rate changes have to be exact. 
>> 
>> For example, if data is being input at 2.4 ksps and the USRP outputs data at 
>> 468.168 ksps, unless my intermediate sample rate changes produce a perfect 
>> mapping between the two rates, I can expect a buffer under or overflow 
>> eventually, which would produce problems. 
>> 
>> One solution to this problem, would be to use an arbitrary resampler before 
>> the USRP, that consists of a PLL dynamically changing the sample rate of the 
>> arbitrary resampler based on how full it's output buffer is. If the buffer 
>> is above half full, decrease your sample rate, if the buffer is below half 
>> full, increase your sample rate.
>> 
>> Now the question. I assume I'm not the first person that has needed to do 
>> something like this, is there a built in mechanism to handle this problem 
>> already or do I have to create the feedback loop structure myself? I'd 
>> rather not re-invent the wheel.
>> 
>> v/r, Rich _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio [1]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio [1]
 

Links:
------
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to