On 25.06.2015 07:57, Jon Szymaniak wrote: > Thank you very much for the additional clarification and details, Doug > and Tom! > > So from what you've said, the ordering is an implementation-specific > detail that an API user shall not assume. To ensure compatibility with > past, present, and future GNU Radio versions, the API user is > responsible for sorting the returned vector, if that's required. Do you > agree?
Jon, Tom *did* say that tags are sorted since the multimap change. To be both forward- and mostly backward-compatible, what you're saying is true. I'm wondering if we might add a #define for the multimap change... that way, one could conditionally compile in a std::sort if required. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
