> What I meant was that you plot the result of your timing + phase recovery

> into an XY plot, that would take care of those additional points you're
seeing.

 

I have to confess that I don't even know what that means or how to go about
accomplishing it. I have to take baby steps because I'm a baby. ;-) If you
could point me to an example or some other things to try, that would be
helpful. 

 

I looked through the examples that ship with GNURadio and didn't see
anything obvious. Also, I looked through the GRC block tree to see if I
could try something. There's a Synchronizers section. Something from there?

 

You thought maybe it was oversampled. It occurred to me that maybe the X-Y
chart rate should be samp_rate/8, but I tried that and the chart still look
largely the same.

 

mlist_qam_constellation_xy.grc.png

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Martin Braun
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 1:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] trouble with QAM mod/ WX GUI Constellation
Sink

 

On 17.07.2015 12:43, Bill Eaton wrote:

> From Martin Braun:

> 

>>My preference is to build the demod/sync chain with it's own blocks, 

>>and then just output the complex symbols

> 

>> into either an X/Y plot (WX) or the QT Constellation Sink

> 

> Even an X/Y plot ends up looking funny. I've attached a GRC file for 

> X-Y, and when you turn on persistence, it looks better. But it's very 

> strange. Maybe my bits_per_symbol is wrong. Or maybe the sample rate 

> for the X-Y chart should be different than the random sample rate? 

> Here's the 4 QAM X-Y.

 

Your plot looks fine, it's just oversampled (but perfectly
time-synchronized, I'm guessing this is post-pulse shaping + noise?).

 

What I meant was that you plot the result of your timing + phase recovery
into an XY plot, that would take care of those additional points you're
seeing.

 

M

 

 

_______________________________________________

Discuss-gnuradio mailing list

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

 

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to