On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Daniel Marlow <mar...@princeton.edu> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
>   We are experiencing unexpected behavior with the time stamps in the meta
> file headers.   It
> appears that in cases where the flowgraph experiences data drops, the
> timestamp is properly
> updated.   However, in cases, where the flowgraph hits the maximum segment
> size (4 MB in our case),
> the calculation of timestamp is done in such a way that appears to neglect
> a decimation factor
> in one of our  blocks (keep_1_in_n).     Details can be found below.   Any
> suggestions as to what's
> going on or what to do about it would be most appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
> Dan Marlow
>
> Details:
>
>    OS: Ubuntu 15.04 (GNU/Linux 3.19.0-26-generic x86_64)
>
>    H/W:  Ettus B210 with GPSDO,
>              Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4430 CPU @ 3.00GHz 8GB memory USB3
>
> gnuradio:  3.7.8
>
> Flowgraph:   This is provided to give an idea of what we are doing.  It is
> close to what we
>                      are using, but not exact, since we edited the output
> generated by GRC.
>
>
>
>
> The actual top_block we are running is attached below.
>
>
>
>
> Results:  gr_read_file_metadata test09.dat > headers.txt
>


Yeah, I think I can see this as a problem. It's getting the sample rate
from the UHD device as a tag, but that doesn't know that the sample rate
has been changed through the flowgraph.

Can you open an issue on the gnuradio.org issue tracker to remind me about
this?

Tom
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to