Many thanks Bastian!

I checked the loopback version and it seems to work very well.

I'll check over-the-air and report here!

On 15 December 2015 at 19:04, Bastian Bloessl <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I replaced the Frequency Xlating FFT filters with FIR filters, used the
> Low-Pass Filter Taps block to generate taps (since I can’t get my head
> around this notation), and removed the filter from the first conversion.
>
> Now, it seems to work. At least it receives frames. If you still have
> problems I can send you the flow graph.
>
> Best,
> Bastian
>
>
> > On 15 Dec 2015, at 10:05, Saulo Queiroz <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Each stream has been shiffted with the xlating block.
> > The intention is to "split" a 20 MHz wide analog channel into two of 10
> MHz.
> > Each 10 MHz channel transmit its own ofdm frame.
> > I attached the flowgraph for more details.
> >
> > thanks in advance.
> >
> > On 15 December 2015 at 17:42, Martin Braun-2 [via GnuRadio] <[hidden
> email]> wrote:
> > tP indicates you're using corrupt tagged streams, maybe your add block
> > is overlaying them? I'm also not entirely sure what you mean by
> > 'simultaneous parallel transmissions'. Are they on different
> > frequencies? Are you mixing them together in baseband?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 15.12.2015 04:10, Saulo Queiroz wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to Tx a same tagged stream simultaneously through two analog
> > > orthogonal channels.
> > >
> > > The flow path of each stream copy is: resampling, adjust tag lenght and
> > > xlating FFT filter (with shifting). After this I take the output of
> each
> > > filter and put into and add block then to the USRP sink. I also do the
> > > reverse process at the Rx side.
> > > With some packets are successfuly receive but with so many losses. At
> > > the Tx side I get many "tP". Any tip on how to set simultaneous
> parallel
> > > transmissions without this?
> > >
> > > I'm using gr-ieee80211 (thanks Bastian and team :) that has worked
> > > nicely with the single channel scenario.
> > >
> > > thanks in advance
> > >
> > > BR
> > >
> > > --
> > > Saulo Jorge bq
> > > - "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
> > > tried it."
> > > Donald Knuth.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > > [hidden email]
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > [hidden email]
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
> >
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> >
> http://gnuradio.4.n7.nabble.com/Tag-preemption-USRP-sink-tp57286p57297.html
> > To start a new topic under GnuRadio, email [hidden email]
> > To unsubscribe from GnuRadio, click here.
> > NAML
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Saulo Jorge bq
> > - "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
> tried it."
> > Donald Knuth.
> >
> >  wifi_tx_rx_loopback.grc (134K) Download Attachment
> >
> > View this message in context: Re: Tag preemption USRP sink
> > Sent from the GnuRadio mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
> --
> Dipl.-Inform. Bastian Bloessl
> Distributed Embedded Systems Group
> University of Paderborn, Germany
> http://www.ccs-labs.org/~bloessl/
>
>


-- 
Saulo Jorge bq
- "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it."
Donald Knuth.
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to