Hi, yes, packet_decoder calls crc_check consequently.

My receiver get text(ex/ “HELLO WORLD”) from message sent by sender 

I expected only when expected==actual is “true”, it get text
else(“false”) receiver discard this packet so doesn’t get any text

However, although crc_check return “false”, receiver get text without 
interruption.

I don’t  know why receiver do not discard the “false” packet. 

Thanks for every replies.  
> 2016. 2. 22., 오전 12:30, Marcus Müller <[email protected]> 작성:
> 
> Hi Jawad,
> 
> ahhh you're right, of course! I was missing that the callback actually is set 
> in the grc xml file to a lambda that calls recv_packet, so that's where the 
> checking whether the CRC was correct happens :)
> So, yes, I think the logic involved here is OK, but Sang Hyuk is still seeing 
> problems.
> So: You say packets for which the CRC is not correct still get accepted. What 
> does "accepted" mean in the context? as far as I can tell, they don't get 
> inserted into the output message queue:
> 
>     def recv_pkt(self, ok, payload):
>         msg = gr.message_from_string(payload, 0, self._item_size_out,
>                                      len(payload)/self._item_size_out)
>         if ok: self._msgq_out.insert_tail(msg)
> 
> because for them, "ok" is "False".
> Do they still appear on the output of the packet decoder?
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcus
> 
> 
> On 21.02.2016 15:22, Jawad Seddar wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> The packet decoder block uses packet_utils module (namely the 
>> packet_utils.unmake_packet() function) found in gr-digital.
>> 
>> The crc check occurs in the unmake_packet function.
>> 
>> The logic in that function is correct, what do you think is wrong with 
>> returning actual == expected?
>> 
>> Regards, 
>> Jawad
>> 
>> Le 21 févr. 2016 14:26, "Marcus Müller" <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>> OK, sadly that means I'm even more confused :(
>> packet_decoder doesn't have any CRC checking!
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Marcus
>> 
>> On 21.02.2016 14:20, SangHyuk Kim wrote:
>>> No! I'm using current version. the link was just for showing.!
>>> 
>>> 2016-02-21 22:14 GMT+09:00 Marcus Müller < 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> thanks! Now it's clear what you're using :)
>>> Is there a reason why you used a link to an outdated version of the file 
>>> from 2011?
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Marcus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 21.02.2016 14:02, SangHyuk Kim wrote:
>>>> I'm using "packet_decoder" ( <http://goo.gl/7uVDDa>http://goo.gl/7uVDDa 
>>>> <http://goo.gl/7uVDDa>)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2016-02-21 21:51 GMT+09:00 Marcus Müller < 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> the problem is that the string "packet decoding" doesn't appear anywhere 
>>>> in the current GNU Radio source code, so I'm still not sure which block 
>>>> you are using. Also, crc.check_crc32 is used in two different blocks, so I 
>>>> can't even tell this way what we are talking about :(
>>>> Can you actually make sure twice you got the letter-for-letter right name 
>>>> of the "packet decoding" block?
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> marcis
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 21.02.2016 13:38, SangHyuk Kim wrote:
>>>>> Thank Marcus.
>>>>> 
>>>>> "packet decoding" recovers message from received packet 
>>>>> 
>>>>> and i got false from crc.py
>>>>> 
>>>>> def check_crc32(s):
>>>>>     if len(s) < 4:
>>>>>         return (False, '')
>>>>>     msg = s[:-4]
>>>>>     #print "msg = '%s'" % (msg,)
>>>>>     actual = digital.crc32(msg)
>>>>>     (expected,) = struct.unpack(">I", s[-4:])
>>>>>     #print "actual =", hex(actual), "expected =", hex(expected)
>>>>>     print actual == expected
>>>>>     return (actual == expected, msg)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2016-02-21 20:52 GMT+09:00 Marcus Müller < 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>> Dear Sang Hyuk Kim,
>>>>> 
>>>>> what "packet decoding" are you specifically talking about, and could you 
>>>>> show us the code you've modified?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 21.02.2016 12:32, SangHyuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, I transmit simple text file using two USRP N210
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tx)
>>>>>> file source -> packet encoding -> mod(GMSK) -> usrp sink
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Rx)
>>>>>> usrp source -> demod(GMSK) -> packet decoding -> file sink
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To make corrupt packet, I tried to modify part of crc check
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I guess if the crc of received packet doesn't match with original one, 
>>>>>> receiver would discard the packet.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However, I found receiver accepts every packet even if crc check returns 
>>>>>> 'false'.
>>>>>> (I expected receiver accepts packet only pass crc check by 'true')
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  Why it always return false and how can I corrupt packet with other ways 
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio 
>>>>>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>>>>>  <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>>>>  <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio 
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio 
>> <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to