D means that your network card dropped packets. That usually only
happens if your computer is CPU-overloaded, so that the Operating system
can't keep up with getting data from the network card. Of course,
dropped packets mean that your received signal is irreparably damaged.

You'll need to find a way to reduce CPU usage (hard) or get a faster PC.

Best regards,

Marcus


On 01/26/2017 05:06 PM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I changed the sample rate to 20 MHz and changed the beacon frames to
> be 11g and now the receiver receives some WiFi packets. But it shows a
> parse error which says : 
>
> new mac frame  (length 10)
> =========================================
> frame too short to parse (<20)
> WIRESHARK: received new message
> message length 10
> WIRESHARK: d_msg_offset: 0   to_copy: 43   d_msg_len 43
> WIRESHARK: output size: 32768   produced items: 43
>
> And there are some "Ds" printed on the console as well. I read through
> the previous threads about the frame not being able to parse but
> didn't find anything useful. I checked Wireshark and the packets make
> sense over there and I can see the different beacon frames and RTS/CTS
> transmissions as well. I also saw your wifi receiver video on Youtube
> and my constellation plot looks nothing like yours. Its very random.
> Can you kindly tell me what you think could be going on ?
>
> Best,
> Annie
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Bastian Bloessl <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     On 01/24/2017 12:17 AM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
>
>         I did the following things that you suggested:
>
>         1) The gain is normalized and in the example file wifi_rx and
>         tx it was
>         set to 0.75. I changed the gain to a bunch of values but
>         nothing is
>         really changing. Also the scope plot in the receiver just
>         shows noise
>         and even when I get some decoded message on the console I
>         don't see
>         anything changing in the scope plot and the constellation plot
>         is random
>         as well during the transmission. At 5.89 GHz (which is default
>         in the
>         script when I downloaded it), it shows some packets on the
>         console with
>         random sequence numbers but doesn't work at all at any other
>         frequency
>         which I set by the frequency in the GUI.
>
>
>     I don't understand what exactly you are doing. The module is
>     creating/decoding a baseband signal. It just instructs the
>     hardware to tune to a certain frequency. So if your device works
>     only on one particular frequency, it might be an issue of the
>     device, the interference on the other channels, the antenna, etc ...
>
>     However, I think that it is much more likely that you changed
>     something in the flow graph and forgot to put the "freq" parameter
>     properly in the HW source/sink. Maybe one device is not retuning
>     when you click the GUI.
>
>
>
>         2) I followed the instructions for testing wifi_rx with a wifi
>         card on
>         your page. The beacon frames are not being detected by wifi_rx and
>         nothing gets printed on the console. I dont know whats wrong
>         exactly. I
>         have tested my setup with a simple script sending a single and
>         double
>         tone message at a frequency of 2.5 GHz and its successful so I
>         dont
>         think its a hardware problem.
>
>
>     Make sure that these are 11a or 11g beacons (OFDM). Not 11b or
>     some compatibility mode. You will have to set the sample rate to
>     20MHz.
>
>
>         Can you kindly tell me what could be going on ?
>
>
>
>     Sorry, but I have no idea. Make sure that there are no
>     overruns/underruns ('O's and 'U's printed on the console).
>
>     Best,
>     Bastian
>
>
>
>
>         Thanks a lot,
>         Annie
>
>         On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Bastian Bloessl
>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>         wrote:
>
>             Hi,
>
>             On 01/17/2017 11:57 PM, Qurat-Ul-Ann Akbar wrote:
>
>                 1) The sequence numbers are not in accordance with the
>         data.
>                 Sometimes
>                 the first packet I get has sequence number 0 but at
>         other times
>                 I get
>                 sequence numbers like 5 or 41. The mac frame length is
>         524. An
>                 example
>                 sequence numbers pattern was 5,36,452,753,961. I do not
>                 understand why
>                 are the sequence numbers random? The antennas are very
>         close to each
>                 other so shouldn't the packet loss rate be very low?
>         And are packets
>                 corrupted and GNU Radio can not decode them properly?
>
>
>             The unreliability can have multiple reasons, like
>             - too high gain
>             - too low gain
>             - overruns/underrruns
>             - DC offset (try different LO offsets)
>
>             The constellation plot is usually a good indicator how
>         good it works.
>             Placing the USRPs side by side doesn't always make things
>         better.
>
>
>                 2) My transmission does not work for any frequency
>         other than
>                 5.89G. I
>                 can't understand what could be the reason for this.
>         Not even
>                 5.88G. My
>                 daughter board supports 1.2G to 6GHz.
>
>
>
>             Can you describe a bit more verbose what you did and what
>         happened?
>             Actually, that should work by just changing the frequency
>         in the GUI.
>
>             To debug, it might also be helpful to test your setup with
>         a WiFi
>             card. This is helpful to understand if the problem is in
>         the sender
>             or the receiver.
>
>             Best,
>             Bastian
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Dipl.-Inform. Bastian Bloessl
>     Distributed Embedded Systems Group
>     University of Paderborn, Germany
>     http://www.ccs-labs.org/~bloessl/
>     <http://www.ccs-labs.org/%7Ebloessl/>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to