Ooohhhh, I hadn't even thought about that. Thank you!! I'm still interested in why the Python block doesn't work 'correctly' while the C++ block does, so if you do get some time I'd really be interested in your findings.
Thanks!! On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Marcus Müller <marcus.muel...@ettus.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > haven't gotten around to looking at your block, but I presume it uses > message passing to emit PMTs, is that right? > > In that case, the "message debug" block has a "store" input. > > Best regards, > > Marcus > > On 02/28/2017 05:15 PM, Dave NotTelling wrote: > > Anyone able to help out? Hoping it's just something dumb that I didn't > set properly. > > On Feb 25, 2017 17:32, "Dave NotTelling" <dmp250...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am attempting to test a block that takes in complex samples and outputs >> PMT objects. In order to properly test it, I need to run a vector through >> it and verify that the correct number of PMT objects were created. Thus >> far I have not run across any blocks that act like a vector sink for PMT >> objects. So, I created my own in Python. When I run with the custom PMT >> sink the graph never stops. If I create the same PMT sink in C++ then >> everything works as expected. Attached is some example code. If you build >> gr-poopie with `cmake .. && make && sudo make install && sudo ldconfig` you >> can then run the `test.py` script in the base directory. It should work >> for the first three tests and then hang on the last one. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Dave >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing > listDiscuss-gnuradio@gnu.orghttps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
