So, I've been discussing this with my colleague, and we agree that we
don't really know why we have the burst shaper. That's a really honest
question: Why do you shape your bursts? And: why the arbitrary resampler
doing your 2 samples-per-symbol interpolation? I must admit I'm no
expert in ultra-short burst communication, so I've never considered
burst shapers. What's their purpose? Is it clever to have it *before*
resampling?
Best regards,
Marcus
On 09/01/2017 01:37 PM, Marcus Müller wrote:
Wow! Now, that is a flowgraph that's really pretty! Thanks! Will have
a look at it!
On 08/31/2017 10:58 PM, Edwin Li wrote:
Hi Marcus,
I'm sorry. That was very inconsiderate of me. I made a new grc file,
merging the tx and rx into one. You can find it in the attachment.
I want to make sure the system works with an ideal channel. But I
still have the intermittent ISI problem.
Figure 1 Down sampled signal
As you can see in Figure 1. There are 5 spots with severe ISI, while
others are good.
Figure 2 Packet with severe ISI
Figure 2 shows the zoom in of Figure 1. How can one packet gets so
much ISI while others are good? If my RRC filters have any error, all
of the packets should suffer the same problem, right?
Or could it be that the parameters still need some tweaking? I'm
guessing, in an ideal channel(in simulation), I can use an decimating
FIR filter to replace the polyphase clock sync, while in experiment,
I must use the polyphase clock sync as well as some kind of equalizer
and tweak the parameters until I lower the ISI below an acceptable
level.
Regards,
Edwin
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
