You haven't looked writing an RTP block by any chance? Thinking about writing one...
Albin On Wed, May 9, 2018, 16:24 Michael Piscopo <[email protected]> wrote: > I felt the same way so I rewrote the TCP blocks in C++/boost with thread > offloading a while back. The package should be in pybombs but you can get > it here https://github.com/ghostop14/gr-grnet. Just basic TCP > send/receive to replace the deprecated blocks. Hopefully it helps. > > Mike > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Dan CaJacob <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yeah, use the ZeroMQ blocks. >> >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:01 AM Brad Hein <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Trying to get the socket PDU blocks to send and receive a stream of data >>> is proving to be a significant challenge. I miss the simplicity and >>> reliability of the TCP server and client blocks - they always "just worked" >>> for me. I don't understand why they were deprecated only to leave us with >>> these buggy and difficult to use socket PDU blocks. >>> >>> Sorry for the rant, I'm just running into one problem after another >>> trying to get two flowgraphs to communicate using the socket PDU blocks >>> (issue IDs 1770,1769,1763,1762). >>> >>> These new ZeroMQ blocks look cool. Are they a good alternative? >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >>> >> -- >> Very Respectfully, >> >> Dan CaJacob >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
