Hi Ron,

That is good! I have Gnuradio 3.7.13.4 on one of my computers. Please send
me the grc file as an attachment as soon as you can.
This way, I can learn how to use the Gnuradio Polyphase Channelizer block.

Thank you!

Respectfully,
George

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 8:58 AM Ron Economos <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's a GNU Radio 3.7 flow graph. It can be converted by GNU Radio 3.8.
>
> Ron
> On 12/22/20 07:47, George Edwards wrote:
>
>   Hi Ron,
>
> Thanks again for your help.
>
> When I click on the link you provided, I get the XML file. Please send me
> the actual grc file as a standalone.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Regards,
> George
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:47 PM Ron Economos <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You should probably use an add block instead of Streams to Stream.
>> Here's an example flow graph.
>>
>> http://www.w6rz.net/pfb-filter-10.grc
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> On 12/21/20 11:20, George Edwards wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I have three signals routed to the Gnuradio Polyphase Channelizer
>> > Block. The system operates at a sample rate of 90 kHz with 3 channels
>> > spaced 25 kHz apart. One channel is centered around DC and the other
>> > two at +/-25 kHz. The 3 waveforms are routed into a Gnuradio Streams
>> > to Stream Block, so that a simple concatenated stream flows into the
>> > Gnuradio Polyphase Channelizer. I also set the Channelizer Block to
>> > use 120 Taps and provide 3-outputs. Here are my questions on observing
>> > the outputs
>> >
>> > Q1. I was expecting each output (block set to 3 outputs) to be at the
>> > sample rate (90 kHz/3 =) 30 kz in each of the 3-plots. The plots show
>> > a sample rate based on the original rate of 90 kHz. Why is this?
>> >
>> > Q2. I expected each output waveform to be centered around DC, but they
>> > were instead centered around -25 kHz. Why?
>> >
>> > Q3. The output bandwidth for each waveform seems a little bigger than
>> > the input, why?
>> >
>> > I will appreciate any help that assists to point me in the right
>> > direction.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > George
>>
>>

Reply via email to