following up, this worked for me and i just submitted a pull request for what you described above!
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 9:37 PM Paul Atreides <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome Jeff, thank you so much! > > <end transmission> > > On Aug 7, 2021, at 19:57, Jeff Long <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The most recent stable branch is 3.9. We should add an explicit 3.9 > recipe. If you copy gnuradio-master.lwr to a new gnuradio39.lwr file and > change "master" to "maint-3.9", it should work. > > You can also edit the .pybombs/config.yml in the directory for your 3.9 > build (not $HOME/.pybombs/config.yml) to override the git branch, something > like: > > !!omap > - categories: > hardware: > forcebuild: true > common: > forcebuild: true > - packages: > gnuradio: > forcebuild: true > gitbranch: maint-3.9 > > 3.9 is fairly close to master, just missing things that would change the > API, features under test, etc. > > Changing an OOT that works with 3.9 to work with 3.10 should be > straightforward when the time comes. No big changes like we had from 3.8 to > 3.9. > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 7:12 PM Paul Atreides <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> hi there, >> i'm updating my dev setup to ubuntu20.04. Previous to this i had migrated >> my workflow to gnuradio3.8/python3/uhd4.0 etc to stay current. With my OS >> update i'd like to have 2 pybombs environments, one for a stable but >> current branch (which i'm assuming is 3.8) and one for the next thing >> coming up. Since I want to get away from swig i'd like to start working on >> at least 3.9 in addition to my 3.8 projects, but i don't see a gnuradio 3.9 >> recipe in gr-recipes. >> My question is, am i understanding that gnuradio-defaults will install >> gr3.8 and gnuradio-master will install 3.10 and there isn't an explicit >> recipe for 3.9? i've seen a lot of projects updating to 3.9 support over >> the last year, so i want to know if i've missed the boat and should jump >> straight to 3.10. Are there compatibility issues between GNURadio 3.10 and >> OOT modules that are updated to 3.9? >> i'm planning on porting some older stale projects that were really cool >> and don't want to go through the work of porting to 3.9 if 3.10 is really >> where i should be going. >> Any direction would be helpful. >> >> thanks >> >
