On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:55:02 -0600, Jesse Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was also discussed on #gnustep whether we could/should use a > combination format of SVG/bitmap. I was initially in support of the > idea, but as I have recently been working on some of the more > photorealistic style icons, I'll have to retract my support. I think we > should probably stick with a standard bitmap style icon, perhaps even
+1 > use .icns files, as Mac OS X does. This will also make porting > applications over, as icons won't have to be converted or redesigned. I think it is better to use the proposed .icon and write icns converter. Since most (if not all) graphic editors existing on GNU/Linux wouldn't know how to edit an .icns. While .icon is just a directory bundle, anyone can open the file directly (eg. with gimp). _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
