Subject: Re: Licensing Issues From: "M. Uli Kusterer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: gnu.gnustep.discuss Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:30:05 +0100
At 15:09 Uhr -0800 25.02.2005, Brent Fulgham wrote: >As for the GORM issues -- they are valid concerns >(which are shared for other FSF tools such as GNU >Smalltalk, etc.) IIRC, Flex/Bison state explicitly >that the generated code is not subject to the GPL.
That is because they actually include part of *themselves* in the generated product. IIRC the GPL actually mentions somewhere in itself that output files aren't derivative works unless they include part of the GPLed application/code in them. -- Cheers, M. Uli Kusterer ------------------------------------------------------------ "The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere..." http://www.zathras.de
This is slightly of topic, but I am writing an original wrapper for PCRE. I am willing to assign copyright to the FSF, but PCRE itself has a different license (BSD) would my framework be a candidate for inclusion in GNUstep?
Matt
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
