Hi Riccardo, On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:54:50AM +0200, Riccardo wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 5, 2005, at 01:44 AM, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > >I'm interested because I've been doing some RPM builds for SuSE 9.1 [...] > > thank you for your interest. I'm using your spec files as a starting > point.
The complete set is now up at <URL:http://www.rstonehouse.co.uk/extras/gnustep-1.10/SuSE_9.1/specs/> > > - standard libobjc at /usr/lib/libobjc.so.1.0.0 (not the GNUstep > > "special" libobjc), > >the build doesn't seem to have any difficulty finding the libobjc > >library. > > I think herein lies the difference. your libobjc is found without > problems by the linker since it is in a standard system place. Since I > have an older compiler revision I _need_ the libobjc version put in a > non-default place. Thus I think you don't even notice your > LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not set. Ah, thanks, I hadn't appreciated that. -- Richard Stonehouse _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
