Personally I would prefer that gnustep-base evolves into a state so that it can be used for non-GNUstep development (eg no GNUstep.sh, proper integration into Unix/Windows).
Well, now that the pathutilities patch is in the need to source GNUstep.sh at startup has gone so I guess its getting closer to what you want.
I am curious, though, to know what you mean by "proper integration" into Unix and what are the key issues which result in -base not being "properly integrated".
I definitely would like to drop lF once gstep-base is a suitable replacement.
Can you provide the criteria under which -base would be evaluated as suitable?
Regards, Sheldon
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
