> >>> It says in the GNUstep developer FAQ that Core Foundation > >>> should not be used. Would it be a good idea for me to make a > >>> free implementation? > >>> > >>> > >> No, because apple's is already a free implementation. Apple's. > >> The thing is, you really shouldn't be using CoreData unless > >> speed is a major concern. > >> > >> > > This isn't the thread about CoreData. (Haven't you noticed that > > Apple is calling a lot of these frameworks things beginning > > with `Core': Core Data, Core Audio, Core MIDI, Core OpenGL, > > CoreServices, Core Foundation, ...?) > > > > > Sorry...brain fart. I meant CoreFoundation. Apple's implementation > is licensed under the APSLv2 So why does the GNUstep developer FAQ say not to use it?
> >> lots of people like to do stupid stuff like use CFString instead > >> of NSString just because they think it's faster. Well, GNUstep's > >> NSString is faster than OS X's, for instance. Which parts of CF > >> does your current app use? > >> > >> > > None. > So why do you care about having support for it? Seriously. Compatibility. If we don't have support for a Mac OS X library that falls under the scope of GNUstep and dosen't use OSX specific features, we are turning down opportunities for more compatibility! > >>> Samuel Lauber > >>> > >>> P.S. Please reply to me, I am having problems with the list. -- _______________________________________________ Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way: Download Opera 8 at http://www.opera.com _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
