On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:32:57AM +0200, Helge Hess wrote: > Well, there are two reasons which I heard in the discussion: > a) there is no Svn admin support on GNU servers
I am still figuring this one out and have contacted some GNU people about subversion support for GNUstep. > b) Svn is not a viable option for GNU projects due to licensing > issues (is this really true?) There is obviously no issue or gcc wouldn't be moving to it next week. > The reason people are using Svn is definitely not "hype" as some > other people suggested in the thread. Its just a straightforward > replacement for CVS which has proven itself in various major > deployments over some quite a long time now. I can't agree with you more here. With the exception of finding a server, moving from CVS => Subversion brings many benefits for not a lot of effort. The learning curve is non-existant. Assuming we find a place that everyone agrees with for hosting, I can only ask one question: Why not? Cheers, Andy -- Andrew Ruder http://www.aeruder.net _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
