Cody, --- Cody Brimhall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > List- > > Especially with regards to a project as incomplete as GNUstep.
Please quantify your assertion that GNUstep is "incomplete". Thanks. :) > Several of the main GNUstep packages haven't even reached a 1.0 > version, so a lot of very useful development would be missed by the > masses if they were to wait for less frequent "jumbo" releases. Currently the only core library package which is not at 1.0 yet are gui & back, and it's shaping up nicely. In my opinion they should be 1.0 now. > Which actually reminds me of a somewhat tangental thought: is anyone > putting any work right now towards a graphical installer? Wouldn't > need to do much more than run GNUstep-Startup. The Startup script > greatly eased the process of installing GNUstep, but a graphical > installer would make it all the more aproachable. Since, by definition, someone wouldn't have GNUstep itself installed the installer might need to rely on WiNGS or some other library with a similar look. > > Sorry, though. This is getting off-topic. No problem. > -Cody GJC Gregory John Casamento -- Principal Consultant, Open Logic Corp. (A MD Corp.) ## Maintainer of Gorm (IB Equiv.) for GNUstep. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
