On 2006-07-30 19:37:37 +0200 Yves de Champlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I don't really know much how subprojects work so I can't say much,
but
theses two subprojects types are really two different things that
happen to
have the same name because of their nested structure. We could
talk, for
example :
For each example, you create 3 directories.
The first would have projectX/, subprojectA/ and subprojectB/, the
second would have projectY/, extensionA/, extensionB/, that each
contain the appropriate source. Now the top most GNUmakefile of each
example would have the following 3 lines
TOP_DIR - Project X - subproject a
- subproject b (here, X depends on a and b)
include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/common.make
SUBPROJECTS = subprojectA subprojectB projectX
include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/aggregate.make
- Project Y - extension a
- extension b (here, a and b depend on Y)
include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/common.make
SUBPROJECTS = projectY extensionA extensionB
include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/aggregate.make
That's all. As I said, it all just depends on the order how you order
the subdirectories. Or maybe I'm just missing the point?
Well, yes, of course you always would have to put the Project [X or Y]
in a separate subdirectory. If you do not want to or cannot (for
whatever reason) this wouldn't work.
--
Chris
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
