-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Helge Hess wrote: > Even if this is the case (nobody seems to use it!) producing packages > which install it properly also takes some more days(/weeks). > I certainly can't write gnustep-make packages which install my software > into /usr/local out of the box? I probably need to manually move > gnustep-base and do all the right settings etc? > > As a rough guess I think it would take about 2...4 weeks to get a > (deployable) port. Its the typical 90/10 rule that the last 10% take 90% > the time. We don't need a prototype showing SOPE/OGo running on > gstep-base, but a solid solution meeting basic QA expectations. > > Actually I do think that gstep-base is slowly improving (adding FHS > etc), but I suppose the issue is that the core developers have a > different viewpoint on it (ie they don't think that proper FHS support > or Unix/Linux integration is crucial etc). > > > Anyways. If someone wants to do the port, you are very welcome and of > course you will get assistence. I still consider it a goal to move to > gstep-base, but at the current pace this will take some additional 3 > years. Probably we have moved to Mono till then ;-> > > Greets, > Helge >
Interresting that I was able to build a self-contained installable binary application package of an app which uses additional libraries and massively depends on run-time loading of bundles just using vanilla GNUstep and all that in one day. I haven't tested it on many platforms though, but just in case you want to give it a try, here it is: http://netdev.netlab.sk/NetMage.tar.bz2 - -- Saso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFjnAzakxhuWWzY78RA4OVAJ9HBhxwqzdftd7W2FnS1MmYWRvUeACgl0Pl XysVOBz2csUzFxGO5yljmHw= =WDLT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
