Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb: > > On 29 Dec 2006, at 01:37, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: > >> >> Am 28.12.2006 um 17:37 schrieb Gregory John Casamento: >> >>> Nikolaus, >>> >>> They would be wrong. GNUstep not an OS. >> >> >> They might be wrong, but it's not their fault. If we want people to >> get it right we'll have to explain it to them in a catchy way - even >> if that might include to rename gnustep-base to gnustep- foundation >> and gnustep-gui to gnustep-appkit. > > > I actually have no problem at all with the idea of renaming ... in > fact, for compatibility it might be nice if we could build them so that > they could be used both as libraries and frameworks at the same time, > so that cocoa developers could link to them the same way they do on > macos. I don't know how to modify makefiles etc to build them that > way, but it can't really be all that hard.
I think it would be great if -base/-gui could be compiled as NATIVE_LIBRARY. I once took a shot at it, but the BaseAdditions part wrt apple-apple-apple made it very messy. I'm not sure if it could be split due to the interdependencies. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
