Hi,
Just wonder if this mail was lost somewhere so I forward to the list.
So I just want to make sure Richard receieve it because he's the only
person that I will consider a suggestion on this. ;-)
Thanks.
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Richard,
What do you think about moving to glib runloop completely?
I'm working on a glib based runloop so to make ease on attaching
sources that required prepare(), eg. glib-based libraries and some
that require the functionality-especially those media frameworks, to the
runloop.
Currently in my implemention, I aim to make it a framework
that will try to replace itself over current runloop at loading time,
but somebody
suggested that may be we should just move to it completely. So I wonder
what you think about the idea.
My current code is here, not complete, won't be compiled, lacking of
performer, just try to address the idea.
http://svn.gna.org/svn/garma/cosmetic/frameworks/glibrunloop/branches/id-glibrunloop-branch/Source/QSGLibRunLoop.m
Best regards,
--
Banlu Kemiyatorn
Senior Graphic Designer
Game Square Interactive Co., Ltd.
--
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
