On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 18:58:07 +0100 David Wetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| Manuel wrote: >| >| > Fixed yesterday (but greylisting apply). >| >| How about implementing some checks like we do? >| >| http://www.turbocat.de/help/antispam/ >| >| Works very good without greylisting :-) We also use 1 and 1.4. 1.1 is IMHO not acceptable 1.2 is studied 1.3 is used for spam tagging 2.1 & 2.2 are implemented via spamassassin 2.3 is here for a long time Greylisting avoid a lot of spams, zero (or near zero) false-positive with little annoyance for real mail servers (except keeping a lot of triplets for xx days). We've also try IP -> Name -> IP test and helo host verification but there's really too much misconfigured servers (including big names like ebay,...) Manuel -- Cordialement, Manuel Guesdon -- ______________________________________________________________________ Manuel Guesdon - OXYMIUM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14 rue Jean-Baptiste Clement - 93200 Saint-Denis - France Standard: 0 811 093 286 (Cout d'un appel local) Fax: +33 1 7473 3971 LD Support: +33 1 7473 3973 LD: +33 1 7473 3980 _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
