On 12-06-2007 15:38:01 +0200, Patrick Georgi wrote: > My question now is what the correct usage of gnustep-make is: GNUstep.sh or > GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES? In the latter case, I'd like to add an additional -R for > every -L, but I'd need some pointers for where to make this change.
We [1] use some experimental -rpath (-R) support for Linux (and Solaris), which seems to work fine so far, thereby eliminating the dreaded LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable. A problem here unfortunately is on Darwin. The library install_names are set to the library only, not their full path. I haven't had time to look into this yet, but I really would like to get GNUstep linking using run path/install names. I'm not sure why the GNUstep developers chose for this approach. I'd like to know if the GNUstep developers have an interest for changing this or not. [1] Gentoo GNUstep overlay - http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/gnustep -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
