Richard Frith-MacDonald wrote: > If that Richard is meant to be me ...
Yes. No offense meant! Now I do not know whether to apologise for not writing your family name or to stress that simple "Richard" means you thremendous contribution and influence. > I'll just go on record publicly here as saying that the above is untrue. > My position is the same as that of Greg and other developers ... in favour of OSX compatibility, > but that does not stop any of us being disgusted by some of the MacOS-X bloat, and does not in the > slightest imply that 'OSX rules'. I was sloppy formulating this, as Markus Hitter says, it's rather "Cocoa rules". > It's perfectly possible to aim for compatibility (for portability purposes) > while deprecating the use of poorly designed APIs. I would need some time to answer this and Gregory's post. Gregory, thank you for prompt response. Thank you, Tima _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
