Sent from my iPhone On Mar 1, 2008, at 0:10, Tim McIntosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm...really? I haven't been following this too closely, but that's not the impression I got from Steve Naroff's presentation (http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/09-Naroff-CFE.mov ). So it didn't have anything to do with working with a maintainable and modular code base, issuing better diagnostics, providing better IDE integration, having the ability to create non- fat universal binaries, or post-link-time optimization? Maybe I'm just not skeptical enough.
Considering Steve wrote the objective-c front-end for gcc, I would not trust anything he says about maintable code or any thing about clang or LLVM. I would in fact say he has been anti GPL since the begining and this is his way to get back at the FSF.
-- Pinski _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
