On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 6:20 AM, David Chisnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1 Mar 2008, at 13:39, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > Didn't you say on the GCC list that you'd stopped using OS X?
Maybe but that is not relevant to this conversation really. Also it might be due to I don't have time to maintain libobjc, spu and still get my day work done. > Last time I posted libobjc patches to this list, you didn't reply. I > currently use a fairly modified version of the GNU runtime for Étoilé > and have given up trying to get patches pushed upstream. To this list. Yes and libobjc patches don't go to this list They goto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe that is why I did not replay to them. So I don't see what you expect from me, to read this list for libobjc patches when they don't belong. And from the sound of it, you did not know where upstream was anyways. >The GUN runtime was broken on FreeBSD for months last year because the > threading code (30% of the entire codebase) is horrendous and relied > on behaviour of the GNU linker. No, it relies on ELF behavior (weak symbols are elf not GNU linker issues). Seriously it now sounds like you don't understand any of the code at all or any of the OS. This now makes wonder if your patches were right in the first place. -- Pinski
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
