Sebastian Reitenbach schrieb: > David Wetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some days ago, I stumbled across IntarS, found it interesting, and I wanted > to play with it. I got it compiled and it starts on my OpenBSD test box, but > now the apache module is missing ;) Cool... I guess that would put be me on the scene... http://www.intars.at/ http://www.seat-1.com/ [original authors and my partners] out of curiosity... how did you stumble over IntarS? I currently maintain the GNUstep versions on which IntarS builds (and it's actually a rather old and slightly patched pre-make 2.0 version we are currently using in production. (see Local/Projects/Scripts/IntarS/build.sh) SVNREV_MAKE=23034 SVNREV_BASE=23034 SVNREV_GDL2=23034 SNVREV_GSWEB=23034 [pathches are in the same directory] We have some install bases on other GNU/Linux derivatives, but have focused on Debian to minimize the surprises in complex environments. The "good" news is, that these revisions should also work with an Apache1 Adaptor. Now if your goal is the play with IntarS, I'd highly recommend those versions. The reason we haven't upgraded is that Dave Wetzel has introduced some slight (internal API) incompatibilities wrt to the WebObjects version which we also have to support and we have some assumptions in IntarS about the GSWeb and the GSWAdaptor configuration which I need to tend to as soon as my customer projects allow me to do that. Now I don't think the GNUstep discuss list is necessarily the right forum to give IntarS support so I would suggest that you can ask me privately. Yet if your Goal is an Apache1/FastCGI Adaptor than I don't think IntarS is the right project for that ;-) and would suggest to build on the new adaptors and focus on Apache2 Cheers, David _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
