Adam Fedor wrote: > On Nov 21, 2008, at 9:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> And one thing makes me wonder a little: why is it still a 0.15 >> release? After so many years of work. >> From a marketing view this looks like an instable experiment and not >> as something that can be used in daily work. >> > I'd like to see that as well.
For a long time I have been reluctant to move on to a 1.0 release of GNUstep gui, but we may almost be there. Perhaps we could define what should go into such a release and which non-coding conditions should be met (for examples the amount of test coverage) and then try to reach these conditions early in 2009? Just tagging the current release with a 1.0 stamp (or even higher) still looks wrong to me. Fred _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
