Am Donnerstag, den 02.04.2009, 21:24 +0100 schrieb David Chisnall: > x86: GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Windows. > x86-64: FreeBSD, Windows (GNU/Linux?) > SPARC: Solaris (not sure if this was 64-bit or 32-bit though)
Add NetBSD to all the above. And yes GNU/Linux x86-64 is being used (I just currently do not have access to run that NSProxy/NSDecimal test atm). And yes, I've debugged on both SPARC and SPARC64 for folks. WRT Windows, I think you'll need to differentiate MinGW and Cygwin and 32/64-bit. > ARM: Linux (GNU?) > PowerPC: GNU/Linux > What else do people use underneath GNUstep? Is anyone using Alpha? > m68k? IA64? XCore? I know GNUstep used to work on NetBSD, but has > anyone tried it recently? David Wetzel is using it on production servers. > I've seen a couple of screenshots from HURD I believe Matt Rice tried to port to HURD and it's definitely a platform we should aim to support but I'm not sure if this was more than an experiment since this report still is unresolved: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18573 > - I guess those were x86? Has anyone managed to get (any of) GNUstep > running on Symbian's POSIX layer? Not sure about those, but I'm sure Riccardo will list a few more... (I think hppa among others). And I'd expect (Open)Solaris on x86/x86-64. You also missed Darwin and derivatives. But I think the best approach is if we collect this information on the wiki (potentially with a contact of a tester per platform). Cheers, David (and once I get to grips with this cross compiling, I'm looking at MIPS since I want ObjC on my router :-) but that more of goody) _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
