Zhang, no, I did not consider that option. A patch set is something terrible to maintain, apply and distribute. Also for the user a patchs et means to have something against a possibly moving target. Add to that that only recently work in Backbone resumed, before it was essentially dead, so it made even less sense.
Riccardo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zhang Weiwu" <[email protected]> To: "Gregory John Casamento" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:34 AM Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Terminal v0.9.5 Did you also consider releasing it as "GAP patch set for Terminal" as long as there are only minor changes? Renaming the "fork" creates other confusion, although a different one. _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
