Ronald, You're preaching to the choir here on this one. Any ideas how to make that happen? I would love to get up to date packages everywhere.
Thanks, GC On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Ronald C.F. Antony <[email protected]> wrote: > Even more to the point: unless there are simple GnuStep meta-packages for the > major BSD and Linux distributions that are reasonable "click-install-run" > easy, most of the effort going into GNUStep is wasted, because except for a > few nostalgic exNeXT users and a few developers, nobody is going to use it. > I didn't have time to play with GNUStep for ages, but I keep following the > development from a distance, but think about it for a moment: if KDE or > something like it would require that level of involvement just to get going, > do you think it would have the sort of adoption it has now? > > Ronald > > On 14 Feb 2010, at 16:34, Fred Kiefer wrote: > >> Great to hear how much GNUstep software you are using. But being a >> developer I am most interested in what didn't work :-( >> Why did you have to abandon your attempt to compile GNUstep from SVN? >> (We switched over from CVS years ago, if you really tried CVS then this >> was a very old version of GNUstep) >> >> And are there any interesting patches on the debian patch system for >> GNUstep that didn't make it upstream? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep > -- Gregory Casamento yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa (240)274-9630 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
