On 15 Mar 2010, at 12:59, David Chisnall wrote: > The solution in other test suites is to mark it as an expected failure. > Then, if it fails the user gets a 1 Expected Failure in the output and > ignores it, but if it works for a developer they get 1 Unexpected Pass and > have a look to see what it was. We could do this quite easily with an > xfail() version of the pass() function.
Which, by the look of it, is exactly what you did in svn half an hour before I wrote this email. hope() - I love the name! Only now my hopes are dashed whenever I run the test suite :-( David _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
