2011/1/9 Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller <[email protected]>: >> No spam for both. One thing not really related to this but the SWI >> keeps rejecting me submitting a new app because I didn't type the >> human verification code correctly but I did. > > Please submit a bug report if it is repeatable. I just tested and it appears > to work. Please note that there is a trick behind the verification code.
Strange. It happened yesterday. >> If you put one or two persons who should code or learn to code for >> GNUstep to maintain a full features web app then there's even less >> people to help with the actual product. > > I have spent less than 5% of time on SWI compared to GNUstep code... > It was originally developed for a different purpose and just reused > for GNUstep. Ok. > >> Clean up is just a matter of revert, but as I said that bot with front >> end would do the job with extra benefits and possibly less code. > > Please write a prototype and install it somewhere and let us test it. > Then we can do more than guessing and exchanging opinions. > Ah! I am not interested by doing that as I never said I want any SWI and won't do that just because I think it should be done my way. ie. I just wonder why it was not done that way. > Nikolaus > > > -- .----. Banlu Kemiyatorn /.../\...\ 漫画家 |.../ \...| http://qstx.blogspot.com (Free Software Advocacy & Development) |../ \..| http://feedbat.blogspot.com (Studio Work For Hire) \/ \/ http://groundzerostudiocomplex.blogspot.com (Studio Research) _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
