Almost too long! :-) I didn't think you intend any offense, rather happy to 
hear that people still like and use it actually. I kinda prefered to be listed 
as an artist than developer. (not because it's better imo or anything)

----- Original message -----
> Banlu,
> 
> I intended no offense with my comment, I was just making the point that,
> for a project, sometimes "dead" is basically equivalent to "complete and
> sufficient."   I think WindowMaker development stalled because it wasn't
> really obvious that there was anything more to be done with it.   As far
> as I am concerned, it is complete and sufficient for my needs.   I can't
> think of a single thing that I would want changed.   The guys that wrote
> it can be very proud of the accomplishment -- it is a great piece of
> software.
> 
> I was vaguely aware of your name from the icon licensing in the
> WindowMaker README file (WTFPL, LOL! ;-D), but not aware that you were a
> core developer of it.   If so, then,   "Thank You", too.   Probably the
> only piece of software I have used more consistently and constantly has
> been EMACS.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> --Robert
> 
> On Mar 19, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote:
> 
> > I am pretty sure we dont need a screenshot for old wmaker user like
> > you or its 3rd core developer like me. ;-) And if you were so happy
> > with WMaker, you probably didn't spend enough time with GNUstep. 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Sent from my GNU/Linux N900 
> > 
> > ----- Original message ----- 
> > > Dead or not, I've been using WindowMaker as my window manager since
> > > the   mid-1990s, on Solaris, Linux, and AIX, every day, and very
> > > often over   VPN.   I've never had it crash; never had to fuss with
> > > it.   Being old   doesn't disqualify it from being good at what it
> > > does.   It was usable   over dial-up when nothing else was. 
> > > 
> > > I can't say anything good about GNOME.   It was installed as part of
> > > the   'Sun Java Desktop System' when I upgraded my U60 here at home
> > > to Solaris   10, and made that machine practically useless for local
> > > desktop use, it   was so insanely slow.   Removing GNOME from it was
> > > like excising a cancer. 
> > > 
> > > --Robert 
> > > 
> > > On Mar 19, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Banlu Kemiyatorn wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > ----- Original message ----- 
> > > > ... 
> > > > > can't seem to get gWorkspace to work. I am new to all things 
> > > > > Objective-C,and am currently learning to use the iPhone SDK. My 
> > > > > interest 
> > > > ... 
> > > > 
> > > > Speaking of new user, I saw someone asking if WMaker was still 
> > > > recommended, I think we should not advertise the dead Window Maker 
> > > > project in the front page to anyone but some old farts. Please
> > > > replace   SS with a GNOME themed one which could even enabled by
> > > > default if   GNOME environment was detected, declared it as current
> > > > goal or   something. Work best or not, WMaker SS shoud be
> > > > eliminated from the   front page immediatly. 
> > > > 
> > > > Feel no sorry for bragging again and again on this, and will never 
> > > > give up. 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > Sent from my GNU/Linux N900 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > > Discuss-gnustep mailing list 
> > > > [email protected] 
> > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to