Such extra support shouldn't exist as they were like some hacks that barely work and crash all the times until the day I gave up trying to use WMaker for GNUstep development. I know you guys like the WM, but keep pushing it for the frontier ahead is a suicide battle. Just personally stay with it as long as you wish like your old grandpas as probably most of GS app will continue to work fine. But get out of the delusion that we can market it for the mass.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Charles Philip Chan <[email protected]> wrote: > Stefan Bidi <[email protected]> writes: > >> You can just as well use another window manager, such as Etoile's >> Azalea (based on Openbox) or Metacity (the GNOME window manager). The >> look is similar, I guess that's why someone would think they go >> hand-in-hand, but the feel is completely different. > > Yes, and no- these days it doesn't matter much with the advancement of > in-window menus, etc in GNUstep. However, WindowMaker does have special > code for GNUstep to make the NeXT interface style (palette menu, > appicons, miniwindows, etc) work and behave better. Just take a look at > src/GNUstep.h in the source code. > > Charles > > -- > Why use Windows, since there is a door? > (By [email protected], Andre Fachat) > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep > > -- .----. Banlu Kemiyatorn /.../\...\ 漫画家 |.../ \...| http://qstx.blogspot.com (Free Software Advocacy & Development) |../ \..| http://feedbat.blogspot.com (Studio Work For Hire) \/ \/ http://groundzerostudiocomplex.blogspot.com (Studio Research) _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
