On 5 Oct 2011, at 11:18, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote: > Besides its ugly, and forces one more step to do on the user before he can > use gnustep programs, is there any good advantage of using procfs instead of > the fake main? > Will stuff be noticeably faster, more stable, whatever?
The fake main stuff is fragile, because it will break if the compilation unit containing main() does not include the GNUstep headers. For example, if you have a main.c that then calls into some Objective-C stuff later, it won't work. On FreeBSD, we use kvm to get this, with some slight fudges. I don't know if the same code path works on OpenBSD - you can try it (you may need to enable kvm in configure). David -- Sent from my Cray X1 _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
