I think the original post was about libperformance, a GNUstep library not GNUstep itself. But this was so long ago, I might be wrong.
Fred On the road Am 07.10.2011 um 23:24 schrieb Gregory Casamento <[email protected]>: > Nat, > > I don't speak for the FSF or for GNU, but as the maintainer of an FSF > project I can say this from experience... > > It is okay to develop free software on top of proprietary systems. > This was, in fact, how the FSF operated for a very long time before > Linux came along. Linux is relatively recent phenomenon. > > What I was particularly wondering about is why try to get GNUstep to > work on Mac OS X since the Mac has it's own implementation of GNUstep > it's called "Cocoa." > > Later, GC > P.S. I have no objections to getting GNUstep running on 10.7 if that's > what people need. I'm just curious for myself, I'm not putting the > "kibosh" on anything. > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Nat! <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Am 05.10.2011 um 01:46 schrieb Gregory Casamento: >> >>> Why do you want to run GNUstep on 10.7? >> >> Is it now the gnu project policy to recommend the use of non-free software ? >> >> Ciao >> Nat! >> --------------------------------------------------- >> Vom Reden wird die Kuh nicht gemolken. -- K. Immler >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Discuss-gnustep mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >> > > > > -- > Gregory Casamento - GNUstep Lead/Principal Consultant, OLC, Inc. > yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa > (240)274-9630 (Cell) > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
