On 27 May 2012, at 18:31, Fred Kiefer wrote: > That was a very nice explanation, but in this specific case, I don't see how > floating point pointers come into play. Did you look at the actual code in > question? This is just an integer swapping macro that operates on the fields > in a time zone structure.
Ooops, I misread the code - I thought it was byte-swapping floats using a function that expected ints. In this case, I think it's a spurious error, and doesn't appear with clang 3.1, so presumably a fixed spurious error... David -- Sent from my brain _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
