Am 24.09.2012 10:00, schrieb Riccardo Mottola: > Hi, > > Niels Grewe wrote: >> Hello Ricardo, >> I just re-enabled this line yesterday because it seemed to be commented >> out accidentally and does the sane thing (as in checking that the >> compiler will actually emit code for the ABI that gnustep-base is >> expecting). Maybe you could post the relevant output from config.log >> (`checking for non-fragile-abi support'...), since this test is used to >> set GS_NONFRAGILE to the correct value? >> > it is strange: I don't see something relevant in config.log! > > I execute: > ./configure CC=/usr/local/bin/clang > >> grep fragile config.log > (empty result)
Okay, on closer inspection -base only executes this test if you configured gnustep-make with `--enable-objc-nonfragile-abi'. So maybe we should have a check there for whether non-fragile is the default. (This is not by any chance on a *BSD platform? I think David made clang default to the non-fragile ABI for some of them…) Cheers, Niels _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
