On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:01:44AM +0000, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:06:03PM +0100, Philippe Roussel wrote: > >On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:51:32PM +0000, Richard Stonehouse wrote: > >>>Is this on 64 bits ? > >> > >>Yes; I haven't built the new GNUstep on 32-bit yet. I'll try to get > >>that done tonight. > > I have now done that and found thatSimpleAgenda 0.43, built from the > tarball, behaves as expected on 32-bit with new GNUstep.
Ok, thanks for the info. > Also, following Fred's suggestion, I took the latest SVN (rev 1093) > from svn://coyote.octets.fr/gnustep/SimpleAgenda/trunk and built it > for my 64-bit system. This seems to give the CPU loop on startup, > just like the tarball version. Looking at the source, so far as I > can > see the only reference to 'NSNotFound' is in DayView.m, and 'index' is > defined as a NSUInteger in both the tarball and SVN versions; there > are some changes in the vicinity but this type has not changed. So I > wonder whether I picked up the right SVN version, or is there a more > recent one somewhere? Nope, you have the most recent. I haven't worked on SimpleAgenda lately, except for fixing warnings and stuff like that. > >>>Which libobjc and compiler ? > >> > >>GCC 4.7 with libobjc1, from the openSUSE 12.2 release. > > > >Thanks. I'll try to reproduce this setup but it could take some time. > > Let me know if there are any tests I can do here. Do you have calendars setup that are being read on startup, and if yes of what kind ? Thanks, Philippe -- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. J. Yahl _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
