+1 for git
On 21 December 2013 22:54, Derek Fawcus < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:05:33pm +0000, David Chisnall wrote: > > > > If we're moving anything, I'd actually be in favour of Option 3: Move > everything to GitHub. That gives us: > > > > - svn or git views of the repo, so developers can use either > > Agreed. > > Especially if the import is done properly such that the tags and branches > are properly preserved. > .pdf > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss-gnustep mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep >
_______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
