It may be interesting to update gnustep-make to pull the file as it is
being named by default in templates used by Xcode during project
generation, yes. :-)

In the meantime, it's trivial to change the .xcodeproj to refer to a
differently named infoplist file. In fact, I often have to do it anyway for
GS-unrelated reasons: to update it for changes in project name, or due to
space-becomes-underscore, or whatnot :-)
On 27 Dec 2013 04:22, "Lundberg, Johannes" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> Xcode (at least from v5) generates a Info.plist with the name
> xxx-Info.plist where xxx is app / bundle name.
>
> GNUstep expects a plist name
> xxxInfo.plist
>
> Is this done deliberately to keep them apart or did they use to be same
> once?
>
> Should GNUstep make be updated to automatically recognize Xcode generated
> Info-plist as well?
>
> Best regards
> --
> Johannes Lundberg
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 秘密保持について:この電子メールは、名宛人に送信したものであり、秘匿特権の対象となる情報を含んでいます。
> もし、名宛人以外の方が受信された場合、このメールの破棄、およびこのメールに関する一切の開示、
> 複写、配布、その他の利用、または記載内容に基づくいかなる行動もされないようお願い申し上げます。
> ---
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information in this email is confidential
> and intended solely for the addressee.
> Disclosure, copying, distribution or any other action of use of this
> email by person other than intended recipient, is prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in
> error, please destroy the original message.
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to